Employment and mental health among UK ex-service personnel during the initial period of the COVID-19 pandemic

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has interrupted participation in the labour force and may have affected mental health, both directly through the effects of illness and isolation and indirectly through negative effects on employment. Former military personnel may be at particular risk as a result of both additional exposure to risk factors for poor mental health and barriers to labour market participation raised by the transition from military to civilian working environments. This article examines furlough and unemployment as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic among UK working-age ex-service personnel and its associations with poor mental health. Methods: Participants from an existing cohort study of Iraq- and Afghanistan-era UK Armed Forces personnel were invited to provide information on employment before the COVID-19 pandemic and how it has changed since the pandemic. Mental health was measured using the General Health Questionnaire and compared with data collected pre-pandemic. Results: Although Veteran unemployment is not higher than civilian unemployment (4.7% and 4.8%, respectively, in September 2020), it rose during the pandemic from a lower level (1.3%). Part-time and self-employed Veterans were more likely than full-time employees to experience furlough or unemployment. A negative impact on employment was associated with the onset of new mental ill health. Discussion: Employment of ex-service personnel was more negatively affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, possibly because ex-service personnel are mostly men, and men were more affected in the UK general population. This employment instability has negative consequences for mental health that are not mitigated by furlough. LAY SUMMARYThis article examines how employment status changed for working-age UK ex-military personnel in the early period of the COVID-19 pandemic and how this relates to their mental health. Overall, the unemployment rate among ex-military personnel was not worse than that in the general population;however, because ex-military personnel generally have a lower unemployment rate than the general population, this suggests they were worse hit by the pandemic. Part-time and self-employed personnel were more likely to experience negative changes to their employment situation. Both becoming unemployed and being furloughed were correlated with negative changes in mental health. However, it should be noted that the mental health data used for this comparison predate the onset of the pandemic;hence, other factors related to both change in employment status and change in mental health could be the cause of this apparent relationship.

COVID-19 survey burden for health care workers: literature review and audit.

OBJECTIVES: Concerns have been raised about the quantity and quality of research conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly related to the mental health and wellbeing of health care workers (HCWs). For understanding the volume, source, methodological rigour and degree of overlap in COVID-19, studies were conducted among HCWs in the United Kingdom (UK). STUDY DESIGN: Mixed methods approach, literature review and audit. METHODS: First, a literature review of published research studies and second, an audit of studies HCWs have been invited to complete. For the literature review, we searched Medline, PsycINFO and Nexis, webpages of three medical organisations (Royal Society of Medicine, Royal College of Nursing and British Medical Association), and the YouGov website. For the audit, a non-random purposive sample of six HCWs from different London NHS Trusts reviewed email, WhatsApp and SMS messages they received for study invitations. RESULTS: The literature review identified 27 studies; the audit identified 70 study invitations. Studies identified by the literature review were largely of poor methodological rigour: only eight studies (30%) provided response rate, one study (4%) reported having ethical approval, and one study (4%) reported funding details. There was substantial overlap in the topics measured. In the audit, volunteers received a median of 12 invitations. The largest number of study invitations were for national surveys (n = 23), followed by local surveys (n = 16) and research surveys (n = 8). CONCLUSION: HCWs have been asked to complete numerous surveys that frequently have methodological shortcomings and overlapping aims. Many studies do not follow scientific good-practice and generate questionable, non-generalisable results.

How to improve adherence with quarantine: rapid review of the evidence.

OBJECTIVES: The December 2019 outbreak of coronavirus has once again thrown the vexed issue of quarantine into the spotlight, with many countries asking their citizens to 'self-isolate' if they have potentially come into contact with the infection. However, adhering to quarantine is difficult. Decisions on how to apply quarantine should be based on the best available evidence to increase the likelihood of people adhering to protocols. We conducted a rapid review to identify factors associated with adherence to quarantine during infectious disease outbreaks. STUDY DESIGN: The study design is a rapid evidence review. METHODS: We searched Medline, PsycINFO and Web of Science for published literature on the reasons for and factors associated with adherence to quarantine during an infectious disease outbreak. RESULTS: We found 3163 articles and included 14 in the review. Adherence to quarantine ranged from as little as 0 up to 92.8%. The main factors which influenced or were associated with adherence decisions were the knowledge people had about the disease and quarantine procedure, social norms, perceived benefits of quarantine and perceived risk of the disease, as well as practical issues such as running out of supplies or the financial consequences of being out of work. CONCLUSIONS: People vary in their adherence to quarantine during infectious disease outbreaks. To improve this, public health officials should provide a timely, clear rationale for quarantine and information about protocols; emphasise social norms to encourage this altruistic behaviour; increase the perceived benefit that engaging in quarantine will have on public health; and ensure that sufficient supplies of food, medication and other essentials are provided.